PROFESSOR IAN LINDEN
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Online Books
    • Emirs, Evangelicals and Empiress
    • May You Live in Interesting Times
    • May You Live in Less Interesting Times
  • Publications
  • Articles
  • Contact

Latest Blogs

brexit chess: QUEEN's GAMBIT OPENING MOVE?

2/10/2019

1 Comment

 

For an hour of two last Sunday night, like a murmuration of starlings, a cluster of tweets appeared on-line; they were voicing interest in the news that the Queen had allegedly asked legal advice about sacking Mr. Johnson.  Context is everything.  It turned out that this prodigious and unprecedented happening, if indeed it happened, dated from before the Supreme Court’s ruling on the lawfulness of Mr. Johnson’s prorogation.  A little more damaging than a hand-on-thigh allegation, you might think (though not say).
This on-line murmuration had been caused by a finely crafted article about to appear in the My View section of Monday’s I, written by its star journalist, Ian Birrell.  “One well-placed source”, Birrell wrote, “told me the Queen had, for the first time in her reign, sought advice on sacking a prime minister before the Supreme Court verdict”, and Birrrell is a highly respected journalists’ journalist. It shows in the quality of his writing.  “I have no idea if this is true – it would be denied by all concerned –“ he said “but the fact it was suggested by such a figure underscores the scale of Johnson’s difficulties”.  It certainly does.  Again context is everything, the opening of the Conservative Party Conference.
In the absence of any other “well-placed source” the rest of the Press and BBC kept away from the story.  Nor did the tweets continue.  Despite Birrell’s prudent, professional caveats, you could easily imagine  the concern in Balmoral: Mr. Johnson had projected the Queen into the public domain as a woman without agency, almost subordinate to the Prime Minister from whom alone she took advice, advice which she must follow even if it might turn out to be unlawful and wrong.  The Queen, though meshed in the web of conventions surrounding constitutional monarchy, is not without agency, even if this agency has to be conducted in an oblique, sensitive and sophisticated manner.     Wouldn’t you, in this position, be thinking ahead and wanting to know your legal position as a monarch in the light of a range of possible eventualities? Would you be that displeased if the country learnt you weren’t sitting on your hands while the unity of the kingdom was in peril?   Parliament was prorogued from 9 September and the Royal Assent was given that same day to the Benn Bill requiring Mr. Johnson to write a letter to the European Union asking for an extension beyond the 31 October date set for leaving.  What if Mr. Johnson simply refused to do so?
Dominic Grieve, the Attorney-General who preceded Geoffrey Cox, the present one, a man who seems to be auditioning for the part of the wicked uncle in this Christmas’ panto, provided an answer in the Daily Mail.  The Supreme Court, Grieve explained, would issue a mandamus - Latin has recently become contagious amongst parliamentarians - a mandatory order compelling the Prime Minister to comply. And if he doesn’t, says Mr. Grieve, he “will be out in five minutes. He will be dismissed”. And, yes, the Queen would step in - effectively sacking him - though this was a “hypothetical position”.
I wonder just how hypothetical. Perhaps the Queen was not being unduly anxious if, indeed, she had sought legal advice. There are two scenarios: the first is that Mr. Johnson whispers in the ear of key European leaders, not that quietly, that they shouldn’t grant another extension, that there would be no point because Parliament would be unable to get its act together and put everyone out of their misery, one way or another, by decisive action. The Prime Minister would then write the required extension letter and hope Mr. Macron dug in his heels and refused to waive the 31 October deadline.   The second would be that Mr. Johnson became a BREXIT martyr, refusing on grounds of conscience – italics necessary - to sign the letter, and thus be duly sacked, be cast very low only to be born aloft and back into power in a future election victory.  Mr. Cummings, your choice.
One thing is clear: whatever happens next, Mr. Johnson will make sure “the people” are convinced it is not his fault if on 1 November we still remain in the European Union.  There are dark warnings from Tory sources of mob violence, read threats, if we do.   Eton mess flung across the Mace in the Chamber and so on.  The Prime Minister shall be blameless, “the people’s champion”.  Many, though, will share the blame: Larry the Downing Street cat, all the Remain “traitors”, the Irish Taoiseach, Brussels diplomats, Gina Miller, Joanna Cherry, Lady Hale and, if as was murmured briefly in the twitter-sphere and things carry on the way they are going, Mrs. Windsor herself. Then it will be Mr. Johnson and “the People” versus Parliament, the Supreme Court, more than 16 million voters, and possibly the Queen. No wonder Mr. Johnson has a problem with women.
See Also TheArticle.com 02/10/2109
1 Comment
ivan kish link
2/10/2019 19:55:43

Mr. Birrell's suggestion is that the Queen, in a fit of regal frustration might leak to her people her true feelings on Brexit by allegedly surreptitious means and " for the first time in her reign."
Whilst agreeing that the unity of the kingdom is indeed a key royal concern would she really employ such a clunky method to remove a PM when he already has the seeds of his own destruction so well implanted. Such confidential matters, if ever uttered, NEVER leave the confines of the royal residences.

HM knows full well that it is just a matter of time before similar issues find their own solutions and in no way plans to generate a sequence of events which might be construed as meddling in the democratic process of the British people. That would be a most unwelcome addition to her historical CV.

And that is why this article by Birrell is manifestly a clever but mischievous invention fomented by Birrell to keep his maverick reputation bubbling, knowing that there will not be any direct HM denials, counter tweets or articles.

Hiding behind the " one well placed source " is a well worn journalistic stratagem whichn it is not surprising to find in the nether regions of the British press which is so quick to to echo the American First amendment when it suits them.

An pray, how does our well connected journalist or his source possibly know that HM had for the first time in her reign sought advice on sacking a Prime Minister? One imagines that there have been several times in her reign over 14 PMs when the thought had passed through her mind ( remember Sir Anthony Eden ) only to be rightly rejected as not impossible but unconstitutional according to our centuries of common law and experience.

Dominic Grieve, quick to air his schoolboy Latin confirms Birrell's flight of fancy, writing in a sister tabloid newspaper that
" mandamus" would result in a fifteenth British PM in double quick time.
The might have beens of History would indeed fill many volumes (or even hard drives ) but this particular scenario is no more than journalistic bombast in the interest of personal careers and newspaper sales. ( Anyone remember Boris Johnson?)

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Online Books
    • Emirs, Evangelicals and Empiress
    • May You Live in Interesting Times
    • May You Live in Less Interesting Times
  • Publications
  • Articles
  • Contact