PROFESSOR IAN LINDEN
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Online Books
    • Emirs, Evangelicals and Empiress
    • May You Live in Interesting Times
    • May You Live in Less Interesting Times
  • Publications
  • Articles
  • Contact

Latest Blogs

BREXIT: WHO LOSES, WHERE & WHY?

28/7/2018

3 Comments

 
​The final days of the last Parliamentary session resembled the end of term in a failing school.  A June away-day in the North-East had not improved things. Discipline was collapsing.  Students who should have been excluded hadn’t been.    Prefects were running amok.  The teaching staff appeared increasingly inept and incapable of controlling the class.  Two had resigned.  Everyone was falling behind on delivering the syllabus. 
The Prime Minister responded by beginning the recess with a Grand Tour starting with a visit to Hartlepool.  The purpose of this sally had something to do with a hard Brexit.  Exactly what was unclear.  Were the people of Hartlepool meant to understand that a hard Brexit was a bad idea, that the Prime Minister would carry on bravely producing fudges unacceptable  both to the EU and to her barmy back-benches  thus making a hard BREXIT more likely, or did she mean ‘crashing out’ would be better than a bad deal? Don’t ask me.
And why Hartlepool?   This is a genuine question – not a touch of Londoner north-of-Watford disdain - which yields an interesting possible answer.  Hartlepool voted 69.9% for Leave on a 65% turn-out.  (The national figure was 52% on a 72% turn-out).   Nearby Redcar and Cleveland voted 66% Leave on a 70% turn-out, Middlesborough voted 65.5% Leave on a 64% turn-out, and Stockton-on-Tees 62% on a 71% turn-out.  Only Darlington was less enthusiastic for BREXIT with 56% for Leave on a 71% turn-out.  Put these towns together and you have the new Tees Valley Combined Authority, created two years ago, a product of north-eastern devolution with a Mayor, innovative and expanding businesses and some big problems.  Plus a population of 680,000 significantly more pro-Brexit that most other regions. If Theresa May could convince them of her intentions, whatever they are, she could convince other Leave voters.
Sorry to deploy these figures but facts in Brexit discussions are as rare  as diamonds in an Arron Banks South African mine.  The Tees Valley’s problems are reflected in Hartlepool having, between April 2017 and March 2018, the highest urban unemployment rate in the country.  Not a natural Tory Party stronghold you might say, and you would be right.  All five towns have Labour Party seats. Peter Mandleson, no longer “intensely relaxed about people getting filthy rich provided they pay their taxes” used to represent Hartlepool.
In 2017, in the face of the Tees Valley’s economic and social plight, the Combined Authority produced an investment plan and economic strategy which aimed to take advantage of its new devolved status and a small pot of money that gave it a modicum of planning power.  The 2017 strategy pointed up the interlocking needs of the North-East if sustained economic growth was to become a reality.
For the period until 2020/1 the Tees Valley Authority budgeted £464 million of investment.   It planned to spend £220 million on Business, Growth, R&D, Employment and Skills. Of this nearly half, would be coming from European Union Funding.  The Authority has also been establishing funding streams extending beyond this period including £173 million from ESIF, the European Structural Investment Fund. All this money will be lost in March 2019 as Britain leaves the European Union.
To sum up, the majority of voters in the Tees Valley region voted in 2016 to eliminate funding that might, with competent planning from the Local Authority and Labour MPs, have boosted the local economy and created decently remunerated employment. Are we really expected to believe that this is what they intended?
Commitments, pledges and guarantees from government abound.  Yet  further unfortunate facts abound too: nationally most schools are in  chronic debt; the NHS is getting future top-ups but not enough to sustain current level of service; our police are understaffed; our transport systems and utilities are in bad shape; our army, navy and air-force are pared back to the minimum for national security, and our energy future is in jeopardy owing to commissioning of French nuclear reactors that are flawed. 
So - excuse the sarcasm – the North-East has no need to worry.  A Tory government in the inevitable post- Brexit crisis will prioritize stumping up the money from a non-existent Brexit dividend to compensate five Labour Constituencies in the North East for loss of European funding.  Really?  Multiply this implausibility across hundreds of different contexts, agricultural, cultural, prisons, and so on, add new needs created by a decade of austerity throughout the UK.  It is likely the North-East, and to a lesser degree all the UK, is in for a bad shock.
So will Mr. Corbyn cast aside his ideological purity and demonstrate that he is a member of the Labour Party not a socialist sect, and now call for a second referendum?  Two of the Tees Valley Authority Labour MPs, Anna Turley and Dr. Paul Williams, have courageously put their constituents before their own political careers defied the whip and voted to stay in the Common Market.  Will the people of the North-East be given the opportunity to change their minds now they know that BREXIT means the economy of the North-East will be damaged.  Will Mr. Corbyn speak out for the poor and disadvantaged whom Brexit will make greatly more poor and disadvantaged in the North-East and elsewhere?  Or will he just sit and hope that the Tories implode so he can, just possibly, inherit the position of Prime Minister in a ruined Britain?
3 Comments
bruce kent link
28/7/2018 17:28:07

Very good message to Jeremy and all who seem to be on the fence

Reply
Nad link
3/8/2018 11:24:36

Great information. Since last week, I am gathering details about the experience. There are some amazing details on your blog which I didn't know. Thanks.

Reply
Blake
7/8/2018 06:41:18

Informative and persuasive piece.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Online Books
    • Emirs, Evangelicals and Empiress
    • May You Live in Interesting Times
    • May You Live in Less Interesting Times
  • Publications
  • Articles
  • Contact